


















|
| Market Profile: Japan
|
| Japanese Arrivals to the U.S. |
Printing Note: Set your print mode to landscape and/or reduce your
margin settings if this document is too wide for your printer.
|
Market Profile: Japan
JAPANESE ARRIVALS TO THE U.S.
TRENDS IN ARRIVALS (in thousands)
Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
% Change 2004/1998 |
Arrivals |
4,885 |
4,826 |
5,061 |
4,083 |
3,627 |
3,170 |
3,748 |
-1,137 |
% Change |
-9% |
-1% |
5% |
-19% |
-11% |
-13% |
18% |
-23% |
TRENDS IN RECEIPTS* (in millions)
Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004pr |
% Change 2004/1998 |
Receipts |
$9,424 |
$9,711 |
$10,238 |
$8,902 |
$8,492 |
$7,595 |
$9,343 |
-$81 |
% Change |
-15% |
3% |
5% |
-13% |
-5% |
-11% |
23% |
-1% |
JAPANESE VISITATION ESTIMATES (Market Share & Volume in thousands)
VISITATION TO CENSUS REGIONS AND STATES **
|
Market Share 2004 |
Volume 2004 |
Market Share 2003 |
Volume 2003 |
PACIFIC ISLANDS |
63.7% |
2,387 |
62.7% |
1,988 |
PACIFIC |
18.5% |
693 |
20.1% |
637 |
MIDDLE ATLANTIC |
10.1% |
379 |
11.0% |
349 |
MOUNTAIN |
7.6% |
285 |
7.2% |
228 |
SOUTH ATLANTIC |
5.6% |
210 |
5.5% |
174 |
EAST NORTH CENTRAL |
4.7% |
176 |
5.9% |
187 |
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL |
2.4% |
90 |
2.8% |
89 |
NEW ENGLAND |
1.6% |
60 |
2.3% |
73 |
WEST NORTH CENTRAL |
1.1% |
41 |
*** |
*** |
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL |
1.1% |
41 |
*** |
*** |
U.S. MAINLAND |
37.4% |
1,402 |
38.7% |
1,227 |
Hawaiian Islands |
41.2% |
1,544 |
43.2% |
1,369 |
Guam |
22.4% |
840 |
19.6% |
621 |
California |
16.8% |
630 |
18.6% |
590 |
New York |
9.0% |
337 |
9.5% |
301 |
Nevada |
5.9% |
221 |
5.5% |
174 |
Florida |
2.2% |
82 |
1.9% |
60 |
Illinois |
2.1% |
79 |
2.5% |
79 |
Texas |
1.7% |
64 |
2.4% |
76 |
Arizona |
1.6% |
60 |
1.4% |
44 |
Washington |
1.6% |
60 |
1.9% |
60 |
Michigan |
1.5% |
56 |
*** |
*** |
Massachusetts |
1.2% |
45 |
1.8% |
57 |
New Jersey |
1.2% |
45 |
1.1% |
35 |
Pennsylvania |
0.7% |
26 |
*** |
*** |
Ohio |
*** |
*** |
1.7% |
54 |
JAPANESE VISITATION ESTIMATES (Market Share & Volume in thousands)
VISITATION TO THE CITIES **
|
Market Share 2004 |
Volume 2004 |
Market Share 2003 |
Volume 2003 |
Honolulu |
36.6% |
1,372 |
38.0% |
1,205 |
Los Angeles |
9.3% |
349 |
10.1% |
320 |
New York City |
8.6% |
322 |
9.2% |
292 |
Waikki Beach |
6.6% |
247 |
*** |
*** |
Las Vegas |
5.8% |
217 |
5.3% |
168 |
San Francisco |
5.8% |
217 |
6.6% |
209 |
Maui |
2.6% |
97 |
3.2% |
101 |
Chicago |
1.9% |
71 |
2.4% |
76 |
San Diego |
1.9% |
71 |
1.7% |
54 |
Anaheim |
1.7% |
64 |
2.2% |
70 |
Hawaii (Big Island) |
1.5% |
56 |
1.3% |
41 |
Seattle |
1.5% |
56 |
1.6% |
51 |
D.C. Metro Area |
1.4% |
52 |
*** |
*** |
San Jose |
1.3% |
49 |
1.8% |
57 |
Washington, DC |
1.3% |
49 |
1.9% |
60 |
Boston |
1.1% |
41 |
1.8% |
57 |
Orlando |
1.1% |
41 |
*** |
*** |
SELECTED TRAVELER CHARACTERISTICS
(by Percentage Point Change)
|
2004 |
2003 |
% Point Change **** |
Purpose of Trip: (multiple response) |
|
|
|
Vacation / Holiday |
79% |
76% |
3 |
Visit Friends and Relatives |
18% |
19% |
-1 |
Business |
14% |
17% |
-3 |
Attend Convention |
6% |
7% |
-1 |
Transportation Types Used in U.S.: (multiple response) |
|
Rented Automobile |
23% |
25% |
-2 |
Airline in U.S. |
20% |
22% |
-2 |
Private Automobile |
19% |
21% |
-2 |
Bus between Cities |
19% |
17% |
2 |
Rail between Cities |
5% |
5% |
0 |
SELECTED TRAVELER CHARACTERISTICS (by Percent Change)
|
2004 |
2003 |
% point change or % Change **** |
Prepaid Package |
42% |
40% |
2 pts |
First International Trip |
30% |
31% |
-1 pts |
Ave. Length of Stay in U.S. (nights) |
7.7 |
8.8 |
-13% |
Daily Visitor Spending in U.S. |
$158 |
$139 |
14% |
Average Number of States Visited |
1.2 |
1.3 |
-8% |
Notes: |
* Excluding passenger fare receipts/exports. |
|
** Only the census regions, states, and cities are displayed that have a statistically reliable respondent base for the survey year(s). |
|
pr - Preliminary will be Revised. |
|
*** Not displayed due to low respondent base for this survey year. |
|
**** Variance due to rounding. |
|
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, ITA, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries; Bureau of Economic Analysis |
|
Publication Date: May 2005 |
|