| Market Profile: Japan |
| Japanese Arrivals to the U.S. |
| Printing Note: Set your print mode to landscape and/or reduce your margin settings if this document is too wide for your printer. |
Market Profile: Japan
JAPANESE ARRIVALS TO THE U.S.
| Year | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001r | % Change 2001r/1995 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrivals | 4,598 | 5,183 | 5,368 | 4,885 | 4,826 | 5,061 | 4,083 | (515) |
| % Change | 21% | 13% | 4% | -9% | -1% | 5% | -19% | -11% |
| Year | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | % Change 2001/1995 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receipts | $11,760 | $11,790 | $11,068 | $9,424 | $9,711 | $10,238 | $8,899 | ($2,861) |
| % Change | 2% | 0% | -6% | -15% | 3% | 5% | -13% | -24% |
| Market Share 2001 | Volume 2001 | Market Share 2000 | Volume 2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC ISLANDS | 61.3% | 2,503 | 58.6% | 2,966 |
| U.S. MAINLAND | 40.2% | 1,641 | 42.8% | 2,166 |
| PACIFIC | 23.4% | 955 | 23.8% | 1,205 |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC | 9.5% | 388 | 9.3% | 471 |
| MOUNTAIN | 9.1% | 372 | 12.3% | 623 |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC | 6.2% | 253 | 6.1% | 309 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL | 4.3% | 176 | 5.1% | 258 |
| NEW ENGLAND | 2.0% | 82 | 2.4% | 121 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL | 2.0% | 82 | 2.4% | 121 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL | *** | *** | 1.0% | 51 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL | *** | *** | 1.0% | 51 |
| Hawaiian Islands | 38.9% | 1,588 | 38.2% | 1,933 |
| Guam | 22.4% | 915 | 20.6% | 1,043 |
| California | 20.8% | 849 | 21.8% | 1,103 |
| New York | 8.1% | 331 | 8.3% | 420 |
| Nevada | 7.0% | 286 | 10.4% | 526 |
| Florida | 2.7% | 110 | 2.9% | 147 |
| Washington | 2.6% | 106 | 2.1% | 106 |
| Illinois | 2.1% | 86 | 2.9% | 147 |
| Arizona | 1.8% | 73 | 2.5% | 127 |
| Massachusetts | 1.7% | 69 | 2.0% | 101 |
| Texas | *** | *** | 1.9% | 96 |
| Ohio | *** | *** | 1.4% | 71 |
| Michigan | *** | *** | 1.2% | 61 |
| Oregon | *** | *** | 1.1% | 56 |
| New Jersey | *** | *** | 0.9% | 46 |
| Georgia | *** | *** | 0.8% | 40 |
| Pennsylvania | *** | *** | 0.8% | 40 |
| Market Share 2001 | Volume 2001 | Market Share 2000 | Volume 2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honolulu | 32.3% | 1,319 | 32.5% | 1,645 |
| Los Angeles | 12.6% | 514 | 13.3% | 673 |
| New York City | 7.8% | 318 | 8.1% | 410 |
| Las Vegas | 6.9% | 282 | 10.1% | 511 |
| San Francisco | 6.1% | 249 | 7.6% | 385 |
| Maui | 4.5% | 184 | 5.5% | 278 |
| Anaheim | 2.5% | 102 | 2.1% | 106 |
| Seattle | 2.3% | 94 | 1.8% | 91 |
| San Jose | 2.2% | 90 | 1.6% | 81 |
| Chicago | 2.1% | 86 | 2.7% | 137 |
| San Diego | 1.8% | 73 | 1.8% | 91 |
| Hawaii (Big Island) | 1.6% | 65 | 1.2% | 61 |
| Boston | 1.4% | 57 | 2.0% | 101 |
| Kauai | 1.3% | 53 | 1.0% | 51 |
| Detroit | *** | *** | 1.0% | 51 |
| Portland, Oregon | *** | *** | 1.0% | 51 |
| Atlanta | *** | *** | 0.8% | 40 |
| Dallas/Ft. Worth | *** | *** | 0.9% | 46 |
| Miami | *** | *** | 0.7% | 35 |
| Orlando | *** | *** | 1.8% | 91 |
| Washington, DC | *** | *** | 1.8% | 91 |
| 2001 | 2000 | % Point Change **** | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose of Trip: (multiple response) | |||
| Vacation / Holiday | 78% | 79% | -1 |
| Visit Friends and Relatives | 20% | 17% | 4 |
| Business | 15% | 18% | -2 |
| Attend Convention | 6% | 7% | -1 |
| Transportation Types Used in U.S.: (multiple response) | |||
| Airline in U.S. | 26% | 30% | -4 |
| Rented Automobile | 24% | 21% | 3 |
| Private Automobile | 22% | 22% | 0 |
| Bus between Cities | 19% | 19% | 0 |
| Rail between Cities | 5% | 5% | 0 |
| 2001 | 2000 | % Change **** |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepaid Package | 40% | 45% | -10% |
| First International Trip | 24% | 29% | -16% |
| Ave. Length of Stay in U.S. (nights) | 9.6 | 7.8 | 23% |
| Daily Visitor Spending in U.S. | $127 | $164 | -23% |
| Average Number of States Visited | 1.2 | 1.3 | -8% |
Notes:
r - The 2001 arrivals total has been revised downward from the preliminary
estimate released earlier by OTTI.
* Excluding passenger fare receipts/exports.
** Only the census regions, states, and cities are displayed that have a statistically reliable respondent base for the survey year(s).
*** Not displayed due to low respondent base for this survey year.
**** Variance due to rounding.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, ITA, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries; Bureau of Economic Analysis
Publication Date: May 2003